A · A1 · A1b · A1b1 · BT · CT · CF · F · G · G2 · G2a · G2a10 · G2a10a

Haplogroup G2a10a

G-FGC8029

Macro-haplogroup
G
Parent clade
G2a10
Formed (estimate)
c. 10,000–12,000 years before present
TMRCA (estimate)
c. 5,000–7,000 years ago

Overview

G2a10a is a downstream branch of G2a10 that appears to crystallize a distinctive paternal layer within the western Iranian Plateau and its Mesopotamian-facing foothills. Whereas many G2a lineages are strongly tied to the classic Neolithic farmer expansions into Europe, G2a10a instead tracks a largely West Asian story: it is a lineage that formed and remained embedded in the dynamic cultural mosaic of the Zagros–Mesopotamia interface. Its ancestors likely belonged to late Neolithic and early Chalcolithic communities that experimented with intensified cereal agriculture, ovicaprid herding and the first steps toward metallurgical production. Unlike the explosively expanding P303- and M406-derived clades, G2a10a seems to have experienced moderate but persistent growth within a geographically constrained zone. This demographic profile—moderate effective population size, strong local continuity, and limited long-range founder effects—makes G2a10a a valuable lens onto populations that participated in early state formation without being absorbed into pan-regional demographic waves. In archaeogenetic terms, it behaves like a "quiet background" lineage: not numerically dominant, but consistently present across multiple time slices of western Iranian and northern Mesopotamian history. The branch’s time depth overlaps with the later phases of the Halaf–Ubaid cultural transitions and the rise of proto-urban centers in the foothills rather than the alluvial Mesopotamian core. This suggests that G2a10a-bearing groups may have contributed disproportionately to the highland-connected, tribal and semi-tribal elements within larger imperial formations that later emerged in the region.

Geographic distribution

In the present day, G2a10a is most frequently observed in populations inhabiting the western Iranian Plateau and its immediate surroundings. Sampling projects consistently detect the lineage among Luri, Bakhtiari, Kurdish, and some Persian-speaking groups from provinces such as Lorestan, Kermanshah, Ilam, and parts of Khuzestan and Hamadan. These regions correspond closely to the ecotonal zones where highland valleys descend into steppe and river plains—areas historically associated with transhumant herding and small-scale agriculture rather than dense irrigation-based urbanization. Outside Iran, G2a10a appears at lower but non-trivial frequencies in northern Iraq (especially among Kurds in the Zagros piedmont), in eastern Turkey along the Hakkâri–Van–Bitlis arc, and sporadically among diaspora communities in the Gulf and the Caucasus. Its absence or extreme rarity in Europe, the Levantine coastal zone and North Africa reinforces the picture of a lineage that remained structurally anchored to the highland–foothill belt. The geographic footprint of G2a10a therefore mirrors a deep cultural corridor: from the central Zagros through the Zagros front range into the Upper Tigris and Diyala basins. This corridor was repeatedly important throughout prehistory and history—as a conduit for trade, pastoral movement and military campaigns—yet always retained its own partly autonomous, highland-shaped demographic identity.

Ancient DNA

  • Chalcolithic genomes from western Iran, particularly those associated with the Central Zagros highland zone, show Y-chromosome patterns that cluster closely with the broader G2a10 umbrella to which G2a10a belongs.
  • Early Bronze Age individuals from the regions around the Diyala and Upper Tigris rivers display haplotypes compatible with early or upstream forms of G2a10a, although low coverage prevents definitive subclade attribution.
  • Genetic modeling of the so-called Zagros Neolithic and Zagros Bronze Age populations typically requires a West Asian farmer component that overlaps with the distribution of G2a10/G2a10a today, strengthening the argument for long-term paternal continuity.
  • Later Iron Age samples from western Iran and northern Mesopotamia occasionally carry G2a-like markers that align more closely with plateau-centered clades than with European Neolithic branches, consistent with persistence of G2a10a-type lineages.
  • Population continuity signals across the Chalcolithic–Bronze–Iron Age sequence in the Zagros region suggest that at least a subset of G2a10a carriers remained demographically rooted in the same upland districts for several millennia.

Phylogeny & subclades

Phylogenetically, G2a10a is defined by the FGC8029 mutation and a block of associated downstream variants. Within the internal topology of G2a, G2a10 lies among a set of upstream-to-midstream West Asian branches (alongside G2a5, G2a6, and G2a7) that represent early Holocene diversification prior to the massive P303/L91 radiations. G2a10a then captures the main surviving trunk of G2a10, with several minor derivations that appear as regional subclusters. The branch sits clearly apart from the G2a2b2a (P303) and G2a2b1a (M406) expansions that dominate European and Mediterranean Neolithic datasets. Instead, it clusters closer to lineages that stayed in the Near East and Iranian Plateau. The mutational structure of G2a10a—moderate internal diversity, a handful of mid-depth subbranches, and many private terminal lineages—is exactly what one expects from a lineage that maintained a long-term, regionally bounded existence with occasional local founder events but no large continental-scale radiation.

  • G2a10a* (basal plateau-centered form)
  • G2a10a1 (FGC8034-linked western Iranian cluster)
  • G2a10a2 (proposed northern Mesopotamian microbranch)
  • Additional private lineages in Luri, Kurdish and Iraqi populations

Notes & context

From a demographic-history perspective, G2a10a can be thought of as an "internal Near Eastern" counterpart to the more famous G2a lineages that rode the first farming wave into Europe. It represents the segment of the early West Asian farmer gene pool that stayed in situ, adapting to the political and economic transformations of the Near East rather than participating in long-distance migrations. This makes G2a10a particularly informative for disentangling local continuity from later intrusive elements (such as steppe-derived R1 lineages) in western Iran and northern Mesopotamia. For a mega-atlas, G2a10a deserves treatment as one of the key plateau-focused branches of G2a. It fills an important structural role: connecting early Holocene G2a diversification in the Near East with the more complex cultural mosaics of the Bronze and Iron Age highlands, without being overshadowed by the highly publicized European Neolithic sequences. Researchers analyzing fine-scale population structure in western Iran and northern Iraq can use G2a10a, in combination with autosomal components and other uniparental markers (such as mtDNA lineages and J, L, R haplogroups), to reconstruct layered histories of tribal confederations, mountain polities, and rural communities that rarely appear as dominant actors in traditional historical narratives but left a strong genetic imprint in the highlands.